Talk:21,000

Ledgerwright: I have reviewed the current citation for the casualty figure at Dunmarrow, which relies solely on a preliminary report from the Salt Coast Regional Board; given the magnitude of this event, we should expand this section to include findings from the independent inquiry commissioned by the Office of Justice. It is my duty as an editor to ensure that every claim regarding the █lmarkan Army operation is supported by multiple primary sources before publication. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 16:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

HalvardK: I must reiterate that the figure of 21,000 civilians remains unverified by any forensic accounting or census adjustment released prior to November 2039. As per our editorial guidelines on uncertain data, we cannot present this number as fact until a peer-reviewed demographic study from the Central Statistical Bureau is available, and I suggest removing the specific date of the attack from the lede until that verification occurs. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 16:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC)

Ledgerwright: I have added a clarification note stating that the 21,000 figure represents an estimate pending official confirmation, while also citing the testimony of three surviving survivors recorded in the International War Crimes Tribunal archives. We can keep the date and location as they are well-documented facts, but the casualty count must remain qualified until further evidence is reviewed by our board. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 16:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC)