Talk:Imperialist ████████ disaster history
Discussion
Ledgerwright proposes that the introductory paragraph lacks sufficient neutrality by framing the region's history primarily through the lens of 'catastrophic incidents' rather than a balanced overview of all notable disasters, urging the addition of data on industrial accidents and famine-related casualties to meet {{WP:DISPUTED}} guidelines before publication. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 12:01, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
HalvardK questions the classification of the 2040 Portus Magnus Riot under 'disasters' rather than military conflict, noting that standard policy requires clear distinction between acts of war and accidental catastrophes, and suggests removing any claims regarding population loss figures until primary sources are verified. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 12:01, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Ledgerwright responds by clarifying that the term 'incident' is intended to encompass both accidental and politically motivated events causing civilian harm, citing {{WP:DISASTER}} section 4.2 which allows for inclusive categorization when military status is ambiguous, and offers a revised draft incorporating the 2040 Portus Magnus Riot statistics from independent investigative reports. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 12:01, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
