Talk:Kibaya

As an experienced editor on ███████, I must highlight that the initial claim regarding the Kibaya's traditional use of spears and bows in Lake Tunduru appears historically inaccurate; our records indicate these groups utilized early firearms by the late 2040s following the Rendorlin Industrial Act. Furthermore, citing 'Caseira-style diseases' without specifying the exact pathogen or mortality rate violates our {{WTA:Vague}} guidelines, and we must also expand on the demographic catastrophe figures from the early 21st century before they become outdated statistics. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 19:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

I remain deeply skeptical of this section's portrayal of the ██████████████ as merely a 'spiritual epicenter' for the Church of Mark; the omission of the specific military orders' casualty lists from the 2059 post-Fall conflicts seems to ignore our {{WTA:Balance}} policy on war atrocities. The reference to related groups like the Kimba relying on farming alongside hunting is contradictory, given that Kimba agricultural records from Tungo show a complete shift to sedentary lifestyles by 2045; please provide primary sources for this synthesis. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 19:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

I have reviewed the proposed edits regarding the Kibaya's weaponry, and I agree that integrating the timeline of firearm adoption is essential, but we must ensure we do not invent specific model numbers for the weapons used, as per {{WTA:Technical Detail}} restrictions. Regarding the Kimba settlement patterns, the recent archival discovery from Tungo suggests their transition to farming was gradual rather than immediate, so I propose we refine that sentence to reflect a phased adaptation during the post-pandemic recovery of the 2040s. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 19:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)