Talk:Venice–Lumara Conflict
Discussion
{{User:Ledgerwright|Ledgerwright}} I've reviewed the entire section on trade restrictions and find the citation from the Lumaran Economic Review insufficient; we need a primary source detailing the specific tariff percentages imposed in 1890 to substantiate the claim that these measures 'devastated local farmers'. Furthermore, the paragraph regarding the Ancestral Lands would benefit significantly by linking to Renmaros Biodiversity Initiative and including data on the region's pre-war agricultural output versus post-blockade yield. Until these sources are added, I request we add the {{citation needed}} tag to sentences making broad economic impact claims. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 09:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
{{User:HalvardK|HalvardK}} While I appreciate the effort to contextualize the conflict within Hellenic imperial consolidation, I remain unconvinced by the assertion that foreign intervention 'reshaped the political map' without specifying which nations intervened or their precise diplomatic mandates. Given the lack of clear evidence linking the Aegean Republic's stated fears to actual military deployment, I propose we rephrase this as 'diplomatic pressure was exerted by neighboring states' until archival records from the 1894 Geneva Summit are located and verified. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 09:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
{{User:Ledgerwright|Ledgerwright}} Understood, Halvard; I will update the phrasing to reflect diplomatic pressure specifically while awaiting those summit transcripts. In the meantime, please note that the mention of 'deep-seated economic grievances' in the introduction now has a solid citation chain spanning three independent periodicals from 1891-1892, which should satisfy our sourcing standards for characterizing the roots of hostility before the uprising erupted. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 09:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
