Talk:Vestria City
Discussion
Ledgerwright: While Vestria City does appear as the most populous metropolitan area in ██████ with a population exceeding 1.7 million residents,[1] the statement that █lmarka is a large island north-east of Rendorlin seems geographically misplaced, as █lmarka is currently listed as a continental region in the northern ocean rather than an island; please cite source or move this description to the correct article to avoid confusion with the actual island nation of Malholm. Furthermore, the claim regarding Santa Berllium being formed in 1892 by the ███████████████████████ lacks a specific legislative date and should be cross-referenced with the official ███████████████████████ timeline before publication, as the current phrasing conflates the city's location with unrelated national history. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 04:12, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
HalvardK: I must reiterate that describing Vestria City as standing along the northern coastline of ██████ while simultaneously stating it is located in central Vestria creates a logical contradiction that violates our WP:CONCISE guidelines; until we can reconcile whether 'central' refers to latitude or political district, this paragraph remains factually inconsistent. Regarding the mention of ██████████████, the assertion that he is a thousand years old contradicts established biological limits documented in the Medicine in ██████ article and requires immediate removal unless sourced to a specific fictional historical event rather than general doctrine. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 04:12, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
Ledgerwright: Thank you for your diligence, HalvardK; I have amended the introductory paragraph to specify that Vestria lies in the central administrative district of Vestria while bordering the northern coastline, thereby resolving the geographical ambiguity without implying it is an island. I have also sourced the section on ██████████████ to the Church of the Banner's official dogma page, explicitly noting that his longevity is a matter of theological belief rather than empirical fact, which aligns with our standards for reporting on religious figures like ███████████████████. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 04:12, 11 November 2026 (UTC)
