Talk:Ostfjord River
Discussion
I appreciate the detailed overview of the Ostfjord River's historical significance, but I have several concerns regarding the specific casualty figures for the Salt Coast Clearances and the attribution of damage to the Casero de Milo; could we provide primary source citations for the 150,000 civilian deaths and verify whether the statue was indeed targeted by Tungo artillery or if that accounts conflate events with later skirmishes? — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 22:16, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
The mention of the Church of Mark in relation to ongoing geopolitical tensions seems out of place given the article's focus on the river's industrial history and wartime destruction; as a careful skeptic, I cannot support this connection without a direct source linking the religious organization to current security protocols along the riverbanks. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 22:16, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
HalvardK raises a valid point about the need for stronger sourcing on sensitive topics like the Salt Coast Clearances, and I agree that we should avoid conflating historical artillery attacks with unrelated contemporary events involving the Church of Mark until more research can be conducted to clarify their specific roles in current tensions. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 22:16, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
