Talk:Rendorlin Ocean

I have reviewed the current text against our sourcing policy and found that every claim regarding the ocean's surface area, depth averages, and the historical development of Lysander requires an explicit citation to a primary source or a peer-reviewed report rather than just footnotes from earlier edits; please expand this section by adding specific data points from the Rendorlin Hydrographic Bureau's 2059 annual review. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 00:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

While I agree that citations are necessary for the claims about trade routes and shipwreck tourism, I remain unconvinced by the assertion that overfishing is currently the dominant threat compared to climate-driven acidification noted in the Seltavane Sea studies; without direct evidence from a comparative impact assessment published within the last decade, we should not present the pollution and fishing statistics as equally weighted factors. — HalvardK (talk | contribs) 00:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)

HalvardK, you are correct that our policy on environmental science demands rigorous comparative data before listing multiple threats with equal weight, so I have added a draft sentence calling for the citation of the 2060 Rendorlin Ocean State Report to substantiate the balance between overfishing and acidification in the next revision. — Ledgerwright (talk | contribs) 00:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)